
If you’ve been keeping even a distant eye on the bodybuilding community, you’ve likely come across discussions (read: heated debates) on the issue of single vs. multiple sets.
Single set training, a variation of which is referred to as HIT (High Intensity Training), is characterized by maximal efforts performed in one set. Multiple set training, also termed “volume training,” is lifting which involves multiple sets of usually sub-maximal efforts.
For the casual observer and the less seasoned lifter, the question might simply be “How many sets are optimal for strength gains?“
Now obviously there are many permutations of each method which complicates things from a “which one’s better” perspective. Compound that with differing needs, goals and a near-infinite amount of periodization methods, and you have a recipe for a complicated discussion.
Thankfully, there are people out there who are way smarter than I to navigate through the subject, look at the data through a fine-toothed comb, and come up with some conclusions.
In this case that individual is James Kreiger, M.S., whose findings are published in the October issue of the Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. James was kind enough to share the data with me. Here are some snippets of his findings.
The issue with previous meta-analyses (compilation of studies) on the subject is, that many of the studies included did not control diligently enough for variables.
This analysis only included studies that met very strict criteria – most notably those studies that compared only single vs. multiple sets, whilst keeping other variables constant.
When things were whittled down, 14 studies with 30 treatment arms made the cut. Here is what the data revealed:
Any strength training effort is beneficial. In the end you have to look at what you are trying to accomplish. This analysis makes a very compelling case for using multiple sets vs. a single set for optimal strength gains. And presumably if you are lifting weights, strength gains are a good thing!
Leave a Reply